![]() BISHOP MORLINO SSPX SERIESDevotion Series - First Fridays and Saturdays. BISHOP MORLINO SSPX CODEThis code allows for the delegation of jurisdiction from the law itself under certain conditions (supplied jurisdiction). The Church currently delegates jurisdiction through Her canon law as expressed in Her most recent code of 1983. This is because, although the Church has always held that a priest needs jurisdiction to validly absolve, by which means the Church delegates that jurisdiction is a matter of discipline, and thus subject to change. It is important to note that Chapter VII of Trent which contains this quote is not included under the doctrinal section of the session. Obviously, jurisdiction in these cases was delegated by the law itself (the Council). Clear evidence that the Council Fathers recognized this is located later in Chapter VII where it is stated that any priest whatsoever can absolve penitents from sins and censures normally reserved to the Holy See in danger of death. As we have seen, and as both the 1917 Code and the 1983 Code attest, jurisdiction can be delegated either by the ordinary or by the law itself. This remains true even if this opinion is pronounced repeatedly in dogmatic fashion on certain Catholic websites. ![]() However convinced one is of an opinion, it is still a private opinion, and not the opinion of the Church. In doing so, one would be attempting to bind the consciences of fellow Catholics to one’s own opinion. Until this occurs, it is beyond the authority of any individual Catholic to declare, through his or her own interpretation of canon law, that the Church has definitively settled the matter in favor of invalidity. BISHOP MORLINO SSPX FREEI believe that every Catholic is free to hold this opinion since the Church has not made an official binding determination applying canon law to the specific circumstances of the SSPX’s case. This means that the Church provides the necessary power of governance for each individual absolution through canon law. However, after studying the issue at length, I am of the opinion that Society confessions are valid through supplied jurisdiction. This is of great benefit to the entire Church, but would it ever have been so stipulated and from the Chair of Peter itself no less if the SSPX were comprised of self-serving schismatics utterly bereft of any concern for the Church, canon law, obedience and the souls in their charge? Please!įirst, let me start by reiterating that I do not attend an SSPX Chapel. And, let’s face it - the SSPX/Vatican discussions on the whole have succeeded magnificently in raising the profile of a most vital polemic that has everything to do with the life of the Church in the modern world, even giving way to the Pope himself insisting that the old Mass had never been abrogated and that it must be in the light of Tradition-not novelty!-that the Second Vatican Council is to be interpreted. The Superior General of the SSPX, Bishop Bernard Fellay, has demonstrated a consistent desire to mend the rift between his Society and the Vatican. ![]() Clearly, the Holy Father was not talking about heretics or formal schismatics, and Christian charity demands that all sides recognize this most obvious and fundamental reality. ![]() Pope Benedict himself implicitly acknowledged this when he generously lifted the excommunications of the SSPX bishops and went to great lengths to try to establish conditions whereby the SSPX could be welcomed into “full communion” with the Vatican. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |